• @sciencesebi
      link
      English
      17 months ago

      It could. What’s the problem?

      People confuse AI with ML. AI can be ABS on a car.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        07 months ago

        If we were inventing new terms, defining AI that way would be fine.

        But we’re not defining a new term, and most people have a very different definition in mind. Using words to mean something completely different from what other people assume only leads to confusion.

        • @sciencesebi
          link
          English
          17 months ago

          Take it up with IEEE. Take it up with ancient inventions that change the path of flowing water that are deemed early AI.

          That exact difference in.definition allows BS marketing like this. They can use the AI buzzword and you can’t sue them.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            07 months ago

            I don’t need to take it up with IEEE because as far I can tell nobody uses their definition.

            • @sciencesebi
              link
              English
              17 months ago

              I do, and most people who work with AI

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                17 months ago

                I’ve spent a lot of time in my career around people working on machine learning, and I’ve never seen the IEEE definition of AI before you brought it up.

                Going by your definition, “people who work with AI” just means people who work with computers in some capacity. I assure you the vast majority do not use the IEEE definition or even know about it.