• @sciencesebi
    link
    English
    -2
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    IEEE defines it as any software whos actions automate a human behavior. All those fall under the definition.

      • @sciencesebi
        link
        English
        16 months ago

        It could. What’s the problem?

        People confuse AI with ML. AI can be ABS on a car.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          06 months ago

          If we were inventing new terms, defining AI that way would be fine.

          But we’re not defining a new term, and most people have a very different definition in mind. Using words to mean something completely different from what other people assume only leads to confusion.

          • @sciencesebi
            link
            English
            16 months ago

            Take it up with IEEE. Take it up with ancient inventions that change the path of flowing water that are deemed early AI.

            That exact difference in.definition allows BS marketing like this. They can use the AI buzzword and you can’t sue them.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              06 months ago

              I don’t need to take it up with IEEE because as far I can tell nobody uses their definition.

              • @sciencesebi
                link
                English
                16 months ago

                I do, and most people who work with AI

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  16 months ago

                  I’ve spent a lot of time in my career around people working on machine learning, and I’ve never seen the IEEE definition of AI before you brought it up.

                  Going by your definition, “people who work with AI” just means people who work with computers in some capacity. I assure you the vast majority do not use the IEEE definition or even know about it.