nifty to [email protected] • 4 months agoLook at hiiimlemmy.worldimagemessage-square168fedilinkarrow-up1878arrow-down144file-text
arrow-up1834arrow-down1imageLook at hiiimlemmy.worldnifty to [email protected] • 4 months agomessage-square168fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink20•4 months agoIt doesn’t explicitly say it, but that redefines the second to be 1/100,000th of a day. Doing that would break everything. That said, I wish speed limits were in m/s. It makes more sense to me.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish13•edit-24 months agoMiles or kilometers per hour makes sense in the context of travel, you can very easily estimate how long it’s going to take to get somewhere.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•4 months agoIronically, km/h is better for estimation because hours are 3600 seconds. If an hour were 1000 seconds or whatever, it would barely take more effort to calculate with m/s
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•edit-24 months agoI was thinking about estimating stopping distances and reaction times. The number of metres you cover every second becomes important then.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•4 months agoyeah, there was a point in time when we could have. Just now our standards are to ingrained
It doesn’t explicitly say it, but that redefines the second to be 1/100,000th of a day.
Doing that would break everything.
That said, I wish speed limits were in m/s. It makes more sense to me.
Miles or kilometers per hour makes sense in the context of travel, you can very easily estimate how long it’s going to take to get somewhere.
Ironically, km/h is better for estimation because hours are 3600 seconds. If an hour were 1000 seconds or whatever, it would barely take more effort to calculate with m/s
I was thinking about estimating stopping distances and reaction times. The number of metres you cover every second becomes important then.
yeah, there was a point in time when we could have. Just now our standards are to ingrained